Out of the Shadows - The Legacy of Pineland Logo

Into the Community

Yellowed paper with staple holes and tape marks at top, titled "Client Rights" and listing the rights that clients have, including privacy, personal property, and access to advocates

Client Rights sign, courtesy of New Gloucester Historical Society

The transition from institutional to community living and care was not easy for many Pineland residents, nor was it easy for those setting up and trying to operate housing and various services. 

For instance, in the institution, residents had virtually no choices about what and when they ate – and many had no idea of where food comes from, how to prepare it, how to clean up afterwards. Nor had they had choices about much else in their lives. In the community – group homes, foster homes, their family homes, or supervised apartments – they were expected to make choices and take responsibility for many aspects of their lives.

Yellowed paper with staple holes and tape marks at top, titled "Client Rights" and listing the rights that clients have, including privacy, personal property, and access to advocates
Client Rights sign, courtesy of New Gloucester Historical Society

They needed to learn many new skills and behaviors – and staff needed to learn not only how to help them gain those skills, but to not do things for them that they could do for themselves.

As at Pineland, training and retaining qualified staff was an issue. In addition, some existing housing in the community did not meet the consent decree standards that limited the size of facilities and how many people could be in one room.

Parents and family members also had to find new ways to become involved and learn to negotiate a new system to advocate for their children. Respite care, required by the consent decree, needed to be developed.

Waiting lists for services were an ongoing problem. As during the era of institutions, there was never enough funding put towards services, and staff were chronically underpaid. 

Return to Timeline

Theme Alert!

Waiting

Waitlists

Waitlists have occurred since the very beginning of services. Many people who could benefit from services to live more supported and independent lives instead languish on waitlists.

In the past, superintendents of Pineland used the need of more beds as an excuse to call for a larger institution.

Today, waitlists for services are an ever-increasing problem. Children, despite a diagnosis can’t access the inventions that could change their lives and as a result, their needs often become so challenging that they end up in significantly more restrictive and costly placements than they would have needed if they had gotten the right service at the right time. Young people who have been supported through the school system can find themselves waiting years to access adult services.  People in the disability field call this period “the cliff” when youth are without services and supports and many of the skills that they worked so hard to achieve begin to erode and their future feels like it might slip away.  Adults who have services learn that they are stuck in poverty, single, or unable to move as their services may be at risk if they make to much money, get married or move.  Life decisions that most of us view as our right can mean starting the process of securing services all over again, making opportunities to grow and be fulfilled as an adult also fraught with anxiety.

Workforce Crisis

Workforce Crisis

The bulk of the labor that supports people with developmental disabilities has historically been done by “low wage” earners – high school graduates or those with associate degrees working for minimum wage or very close to it. In addition to “low wages”, society at large can view the job as low skilled and akin to “babysitting.”  In addition to a lack of workers to fill the shifts and perform the vital tasks, those that are employed in this field often feel undervalued and overworked. Expectations are low – and services suffer as a result. People with developmental disabilities often don’t get the supports they need from the staff hired to serve them – and the behaviors and reactions that may occur with this lack of support can then lead to abuse and neglect, including an overdependence on traumatic interventions like restraint.

Good direct care providers are also promoted to “supervisor” roles without the training and skills needed to support direct care workers (as the skillset of the two jobs are not the same.)  Of course, this assumption of the skills is simply untrue.  The lack of value placed on those doing this essential work has led to labor shortages again and again.

SCROLL DOWN